<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The difficulties in building a conference wireless network, TERENA TNC edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matthewgast.com/2008/05/19/terena-tnc-wireless-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matthewgast.com/2008/05/19/terena-tnc-wireless-network/</link>
	<description>A former physicist tries to make sense of technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewgast.com/2008/05/19/terena-tnc-wireless-network/#comment-45547</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewgast.com/?p=307#comment-45547</guid>
		<description>I have been to the same conference. While my experience with the network was the same, I would like to pint out that eduroam with it's 802.1X authentication WAS provided and was functional most of the time. Unfortunately network problems influenced the authentication phase and one could risk an observation that over lousy network conditions, WEB portal authentication is more reliable then WPA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been to the same conference. While my experience with the network was the same, I would like to pint out that eduroam with it&#8217;s 802.1X authentication WAS provided and was functional most of the time. Unfortunately network problems influenced the authentication phase and one could risk an observation that over lousy network conditions, WEB portal authentication is more reliable then WPA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
