<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power Company (PG&#038;E, in this case) cares about your alarm clock?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/27/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/27/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/</link>
	<description>A former physicist tries to make sense of technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Surfing the Luminiferous Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; APC SmartUPS recognition problems (&#8221;device not accepting address X, error -110&#8243; or &#8220;device descriptor read/64, error -110&#8243;)</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/27/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Surfing the Luminiferous Ether &#187; Blog Archive &#187; APC SmartUPS recognition problems (&#8221;device not accepting address X, error -110&#8243; or &#8220;device descriptor read/64, error -110&#8243;)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/28/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] After the power scare in December, I decided to run apcupsd to perform an orderly shutdown of Asterisk when the power failed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After the power scare in December, I decided to run apcupsd to perform an orderly shutdown of Asterisk when the power failed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/27/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 04:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewgast.com/2006/12/28/the-power-company-pge-in-this-case-cares-about-your-alarm-clock/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I don't know how your UPS communicates with other devices, but I have two at my place that "magically" talk to Windows boxen and tell them to shutdown when they've got to battery.  By magically I mean they connect via USB cables and apparently Windows has enough brains to understand their language.  If you have a Windows box in your stack, you could get it to run a shutdown script that tells the Linux boxes (via telnet, ICMP or whatever) to shut down in turn.  It's a kludge, but it would work and it probably wouldn't be too hard to rig.

Cheers,
- Denis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how your UPS communicates with other devices, but I have two at my place that &#8220;magically&#8221; talk to Windows boxen and tell them to shutdown when they&#8217;ve got to battery.  By magically I mean they connect via USB cables and apparently Windows has enough brains to understand their language.  If you have a Windows box in your stack, you could get it to run a shutdown script that tells the Linux boxes (via telnet, ICMP or whatever) to shut down in turn.  It&#8217;s a kludge, but it would work and it probably wouldn&#8217;t be too hard to rig.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
- Denis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
